Showing posts with label Church History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church History. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

A Forgotten Voice by Kevin DeYoung


Theodorus Jacobus Frelinghuysen was born in 1691 in West Friesland and died in New Jersey in 1747. He received ordination in the Dutch Reformed Church at the age of twenty-six and served for two years in his native land. At twenty-eight he was approached by Classis Amsterdam to see if he was willing to take a church in Rarethans (Raritan). Frelinghuysen accepted, assuming Rarethans was in the Netherlands, but the Classis meant the Raritan Valley in New Jersey. Convicted by Psalm 15:4–“God honoureth them that fear the Lord. He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not”–Frelinghuysen took the charge, misunderstanding and all, and moved to the New World.

From the beginning of his ministry in the Mid-Atlantics to his death, Frelinghuysen was controversial. He preached emotional sermons, prayed free prayers, practiced church discipline, and aimed squarely at the conversion of sinners. His messages were experiential, fruitful, and popular. He could also be an irascible fellow.
Three centuries later, he is remembered (if he is remembered at all) as the forerunner to the revivals that swept through America in the middle decades of the 18th century.
During the heyday of the Awakening, George Whitefield, the most celebrated preacher of his century, met Frelinghuysen and later wrote about the encounter in his Journals:
Among those who came to hear the Word were several ministers whom the Lord has been pleased to honour in making them instruments of bringing many sons to glory. One was a Dutch Calvinistic minister, named Freeling Housen, pastor of a congregation about four miles from New Brunswick. He is a worthy old soldier of Jesus Christ, and was the beginner of the great work which I trust the Lord is carrying on in these parts. He has been strongly opposed by his carnal brethren, but God has always appeared for him in a surprising manner, and made him more than conqueror, through his love. He has long since learnt to fear him only who can destroy both body and soul in hell.
Frelinghuysen’s influence was not confined to Whitefield. The Dutch preacher was instrumental in the ministry of Gilbert Tennent and highly respected by Jonathan Edwards as one who laid the evangelical groundwork for God’s blessing. Frelinghuysen was truly the “beginning of the great work.”
I’m no expert on Frelinghuysen, not even an amateur. But I’ve read just enough of his life and his sermons to spot several valuable lessons.
1. Dead orthodoxy is deadly. It can be hard for those who bemoan the atheological nature of today’s church (as I do) to admit it, but it’s true: orthodoxy can be dead, and when it dies it is deadly. Frelinghuysen encountered Reformed churches filled with self righteousness and empty formalism. They had the appearance of godliness, but knew not its power. His emphases on conversion and piety were not always welcome, but they were necessary. Let us not be so afraid of emtionalism and subjectivism that we mistake lifeless orthodoxy for faithfulness.
2. Tradition is a wonderful servant but a terrible master. Frelinghuysen followed the Three Forms of Unity. He often preached from and referenced the Heidelberg Catechism. He was, gladly, a confessional Calvinist. He believed in harnessing the power of tradition.
But he was not a slave to traditionalism. In objecting to Frelinghuysen’s insistence on using free prayers and his collaborating with other evangelicals, Classis Amsterdam hurrumphed, “We must be careful to do things in a Dutch way in our churches.” The Dutch leaders did not like his deviation from the liturgy, nor did they appreciate his enthusiasm and the subjective nature of his preaching. They wanted a Dutch preacher who stuck with the Dutch ways.
Frelinghuysen did not reject his Dutch Calvinism, but he wanted to do more than carry on a tradition. He wanted to preach the new birth. As such, he was willing to partner with those who shared his theological convictions and ministry goals, regardless of denominational attachment, ethnic or linguistic background, or social distinctions.
3. God blesses preaching that is scriptural, personal, and evangelical. Some sermons don’t translate well to the printed page, but Frelinghuysen’s still burst with life. When they are not catechetical, his sermons invariably work from a single text and pulse with numerous biblical allusions and references. He knew his Bible, trusted it implicitly, and preached from it explicitly.
Besides being scriptural, Frelinghuysen’s sermons are evangelical in the best sense of the word. Nearly every sermon I read dealt with the sinfulness of man, the holiness of God, the reality of heaven and hell, and the necessity of receiving the gospel and experiencing the new birth. This is preaching God can use. And did. More than 300 were converted under Frelinghuysen’s ministry.
His sermons were also intensely personal. I don’t mean Frelinghuysen used personal illustrations or got “authentic.” He did something better. He spoke directly to his hearers.  He wasn’t afraid to warn, plead, and cajole. For example:
Oh, that you could be aroused! Seek the Lord, I pray you, while He may be found; call upon Him while He is near. For you cannot be assured of your life for a moment. Avail yourself, then, of the present moment. The Lord may be found right now, but you do not know how long that will last. Right now He invites you to come so that He may offer you His favor and grace. He stands with open arms and waits. Do not let this season of grace–the time in which He may be found–pass you by.
Does the preaching in your church (my church!) sound like this? Are we preaching the gospel to our people or merely explaining what the gospel is about? No amount of structural tinkering or missional activity can replace the personal, passionate, pleading of robust gospel preaching.
4. Do not neglect the third mark of the church. To the chagrin of nearly everyone, Frelinghuysen reintroduced the practice of church discipline. He set high standards for the Lord’s Table. The Supper was not a converting ordinance, but a meal for the truly regenerate. Following 1 Corinthians 5 and Matthew 18, Domine Frelinghuysen put unrepentant sinners out of the church, a practice that encouraged holiness and outraged many of his people.
5. Fear God, not people. Many of his contemporaries deeply despised Frelinghuysen. “I am the man everyone talks about,” he wrote about himself, “beloved by many, hated by many more.” Despite the onslaught of criticism and opposition, he pressed on with courage. His motto: “I seek not praise. I fear not blame.”
6. Doctrinal fidelity and evangelistic fervor do not have to be at odds.Frelinghuysen did not accept that head and heart had to pull in opposite directions. He embraced traditional Calvinist theology, utilized zealous frontier-style preaching, accepted confessional standards, and labored earnestly for conversions. He held together diverse inclinations that don’t have to be apart.
7. Passion and courage are no excuses for a harsh spirit. Like all heroes (save one), Frelinghuysen had his weaknesses. In fact, he probably had more than most. He was a hothead and seldom irenic. He was harsh toward his opponents and judgmental at times toward his congregation. His demand for a heart-experience kept from the Table some Christians who made a solid profession and were not living in immorality, but could not live up to Frelinghuysen’s subjective standards. Later in life, he became more aware of his character flaws and realized that some of the “persecution” was owing to his own prophetic bullheadedness. Likewise, he was sorry he had labeled so many of his colleagues “unconverted.”
Frelinghuysen, with his gifts and guffaws, has something to teach all of us, the conservative formalist, the liberal traditionalist, the passionless preacher, and the professional pugilist. Most of all, we ought to give thanks for this man used by God to light a spark that the Spirit fanned into the flames of the Great Awakening. As a pastor in the same denomination as Frelinghuysen, I am especially grateful for his commitment to Calvinist doctrine and evangelical proclamation. I encourage all Christians, especially those in the Dutch Reformed tradition, to listen to the forgotten voice of this neglected forerunner.

See the original article on DeYoung's blog.
A Forgotten Voice by Kevin DeYoungSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Friday, January 29, 2010

God’s Faithfulness Spans The Ages

“Retracing Rev. William Audiss’ Beautiful Steps”

By Rev. John M. Otis

Great, great grandson of William Audiss

Churches of the Reformed Faith for many years have sung the great hymn Great Is Thy Faithfulness based upon Lamentations 3:22,23 – “The Lord’s lovingkindnesses indeed never cease, For His compassions never fail. They are new every morning; Great is Thy Faithfulness. Faithfulness is one of God’s glorious perfections, and being that God is eternal, His faithfulness spans the ages. This perfection is also beautifully portrayed in Psalm 90:1-2 – “Lord, Thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations. Before the mountains were born, or Thou didst give birth to the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, Thou art God.” One of the main tenets of Covenant theology is that our God’s faithfulness is generational. This great truth is reflected in the wonderful promise that God made to Abraham in Genesis 17:7 – “And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant to be God to you and to your descendants after you.”

One of the great privileges and blessings in my life unfolded not long ago when I had the opportunity to retrace the steps of the preaching circuit of my maternal great, great grandfather, and to preach in the old Methodist Chapel that he preached in for thirty years before immigrating to America in 1871 with his wife and ten children. William Audiss, a Primitive Methodist circuit preacher, was born in Lincolnshire County England in 1821. He was converted to Christ during a Primitive Methodist revival meeting in 1839 at Little Hale Methodist Chapel in Lincolnshire County. This chapel was first established in 1837. William Audiss in 1840 was burdened to preach the Gospel, which he faithfully did for thirty years in England and then for another thirty-one years in Wisconsin.

For fifty-eight years William Audiss kept a spiritual diary of his preaching in England and in Wisconsin. This diary remained a mystery to me until my maternal aunt revealed its existence to me about twenty-five years ago. My aunt, Lola Audiss Richardson, while visiting the old family farm in Wisconsin was made known of its existence by her brother Eldon Audiss. As told by my aunt, now eighty-six years old, the diary had been given to him as the eldest son by his father. It had been stored in a chest carefully wrapped in a plastic bag. Because of Lola’s strong faith in Christ, her brother showed her the diary and wanted her to have it. As she read it, tears came to her eyes as the remarkable story began to unfold. William Audiss’ love for Christ and passion to see souls saved was glaringly obvious. My aunt had been given a priceless spiritual treasure. As my aunt revealed the diary’s existence to her four daughters, they eventually collaborated together to type it into a booklet as a gift to their mother. It was titled, God Bless This Little Boy: The Diary of William Audiss (1821-1902). Soon afterwards, my aunt Lola sent me a copy of the booklet, knowing that I now was a minister of the Gospel. I have never forgotten the words my aunt Lola said to me about the diary as we were commiserating about how the Lord had marvelously drawn each of us to saving faith. She said, “Nephew John, I believe you and I are Christians today because of the faithful prayers of our godly ancestor. He believed in the power of prayer and committed his children into God’s hands.” As I read the diary, I fully concurred with my aunt’s sentiments. Here is what William Audiss entered into his diary, while still in England – “I feel and increasing desire for the conversion of the young people. It is on these that depends our future posterity. The conversion of my own children has become my daily prayer. I hope they speedily be converted and become more useful than I have been” (May 4, 1862). He also writes, “Amongst the many pleasing incidents that afforded me pleasure at this time was a letter from my two daughters, who were living with a lady in London, that they had been to the Primitive Methodist church to hear the gospel and that God had saved them and they had joined the church and were trying to do what they could to advance the cause of Christ in that great city. This caused me to shed many tears of joy and to praise God for answering prayer in the conversion of two of my children. Hallelujah. My daily prayer is that God may save all of my children, which is ten, and I believe He will because He has promised and I believe His Word” (June 11, 1865).

While my great, great grandfather was not from the Reformed tradition, and despite being of the revivalist tradition as the Primitive Methodists were in the early 19th Century, it is noteworthy that he speaks in some ways as one who understood certain aspects of covenant theology. Though he didn’t mention Acts 2:38-39 in his entry about believing that God will eventually save all his children, he clearly states that “God promised and I believe His Word.” The promise he probably was referring to is what Acts 2:38-39 states, “ And Peter said to them, ‘Repent and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and your children, and for all who are far of, as many as the Lord our God shall call to Himself. He did baptize children as a minister; in fact, he baptized his grandson, William Alfred Audiss (my grandfather) on September 6, 1885 in Wisconsin. All that he says in his diary is, “ Moundville, John 3:16 and afterwards administered the right of Christian baptism on Frank Elmer Mason and William Alfred Audiss (born March 31, 1885). It is ironic that my grandfather was born on the spiritual birthday of the Rev. William Audiss, who states that he was converted on March 31, 1839. While we know that physical baptism does not inherently save any man, we do know that God’s covenantal promises do flow in generational terms. And if we are faithful to raise our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, and bathe them in prayer, we should normally expect to see our children saved.

Since my reading of William Audiss’ spiritual diary, I thought that it would be a marvelous thing one day to travel to England and try to retrace all the towns that he preached in. About five years ago, using the diary (which is very detailed in where he preached), I used the Internet to see if those towns still existed, and sure enough, I found everyone one of the forty-three towns he preached in.

As wonderful an idea that it was of retracing those footsteps and reading about some of the amazing stories that happened in some of these towns, I figured that it was just a pipe dream. Then, God providentially began to move very recently to bring the dream to a reality. Since I have a small publishing ministry, I decided to eventually reprint the diary into an actual book with additional information so that it would have a more lasting form for future generations. I had not talked to or seen my aunt Lola for about 35 years, since she lived on the West coast. I called her on the telephone to reestablish our communication and to tell her that later in the year I was going to put the diary into a book, and was there any other additional information she might have on William Audiss. She sent me a booklet she had that was done in 1987 on the 150th anniversary of the establishing of Little Hale Methodist Chapel by a gentleman in England. It was wonderful to talk with my godly eighty-six year old aunt after all those years. When I concluded our phone conversation, the desire to get to England became more intense than ever. I told my wife later that day that someway, somehow I needed to find the financial resources in the next couple of years to get to England; otherwise, at fifty-seven years of age, I might not ever make it. Then, the hand of God became manifest.

It was less than a week later that I received an unexpected telephone call from a gentleman from Ireland. He had heard onsermonaudio.com my radio interview on Freemasonry where I was the guest on a New York City Christian program in December of 2007. The program was featuring my upcoming book that I was publishing on Freemasonry. This man from Ireland asked me if I would be willing to go to London, England and participate in a televised debate with a leading English Freemason on English Christian television. The debate was on whether Freemasonry was compatible with the Christian Faith. Since I was publishing a book on the issue and was involved in this subject on a denominational level as far back as 1985 with the Presbyterian Church In America, he thought I was a natural choice. I said I would come, but he said, “There is a hitch. I would have to pay my own way to England, for the station did not have the financial resources to bring me from America.” I said, “That is a big hitch, for I don’t personally have the financial resources to do this. I told him that if God wanted me to come, then the Lord would have to provide me some financial benefactors to make it happen.” Well, within a week I had my benefactors.

Since I was going to London, there was no way that I would get that close and not retrace those footsteps of William Audiss. Lincolnshire County is about 125 miles north of London in the Eastern center of England. As I researched the geographical location of all the towns in Lincolnshire, the only way I could make this happen was to take a train from London to Nottingham, rent a car there and drive to Lincolnshire County forty miles away to begin to retrace those steps. Yes, I would be renting a car in England where the steering wheel is on the opposite side of the car and where they drive on the left side of the road with who knows what kind of traffic laws. The idea of trusting myself not to unconsciously and instinctively default back to driving on the right side was rather an intimidating thought. But, as the old adage states, “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.” I must say that I was frequently praying, “Lord, protect me and protect the English from this American driver.” In a period of three days, I put 327 miles on that vehicle retracing those spiritual footsteps of my great, great grandfather.

I was determined to be prepared. I had printed out detailed maps of Lincolnshire from mapquest. Many times, those maps saved me from becoming really lost. One of the most incredible things is that Little Hale, Lincolnshire, England had not changed virtually at all in its road infrastructure in over 167 years! In one of my resource materials from my aunt, there was an 1841 map of Little Hale, England with William Audiss’ name on it where he rented some property. I brought up Little Hale, England on Google Earth with a satellite picture of the little town (still no more than about 350 people after 167 years). I was dumbfounded in what I saw. I could virtually superimpose the 2008 map of Little Hale over the 1841 map. They were virtually identical! The same bends in the road and number of roads had not changed in 167 years. Even the pasture lands surrounding the town were essentially the same. It was like stepping back in time nearly two centuries.

The story becomes even more amazing. On the 1841 map, it showed approximately where the Methodist Chapel was located. After 167 years, I figured it was long gone. I thought about standing in the spot and doing open air preaching like my great, great grandfather. But, as it would turn out, there would be no open air preaching, for the chapel was still in existence and was functional! I discovered this fact from research on the Internet from the local historical society in Lincolnshire. I brought up the local historical society for the purpose of finding if they had some archived information on Little Hale Chapel. Lo and behold, I discovered that the historical society holds frequent meetings in Little Hale Chapel. So, I knew that it was still existing. There was a telephone number and an email address of the secretary of the society, a Mr. Alf Wilkinson. Praise God for the Internet. I called Alf and told him who I was and that I was coming to Little Hale to retrace my ancestor’s steps. I said, “ I want to personally give them a diary that they probably have no idea that exists, which would have great historical significance for the area.” He responded, “You mean, the diary called ‘God Bless This Little Boy’ done for Lola Richardson?” I was almost speechless. How could he have a copy of this diary? Later, I would find out how he acquired a copy. Also, Alf Wilkinson told me that he and his wife were actually two of the six members of Little Hale Chapel!

From the diary, William Audiss mentioned that on September 26, 1841 he preached two sermons on the Lord’s Day at Little Hale Chapel. I realized that I was going to be in the area on September 26. Would it not be incredible if I could preach in the same chapel that my ancestor oversaw for thirty-one years on the anniversary of messages he gave 167 years ago? I asked Alf if I could have the honor of conducting a special service in the chapel on a Friday evening. He said he would check with the congregation and the circuit and get back with me. A few days later, he wrote saying that they would love to have me preach to them and that they would advertise the event for local Christians to attend – that the great, great grandson of one of Lincolnshire’s most beloved preachers, who was also a preacher, would give a message at Little Hale Chapel. Not only was I going to retrace the footsteps of William Audiss in Lincolnshire, but I was going to stand in the same pulpit and preach the Gospel he preached 167 years ago. My dream was becoming greater than I had ever imagined.

I was to preach at 7:30 P.M., but I would get another pleasant surprise. An eighty -year old lady, Mabel Priestley, who was from a long-standing family in Little Hale, would say to me, “Pastor Otis, would you like to see where Rev. Audiss lived in town and where his wheelwright shop is?” She said, “It is less than a five minute walk from here.” I was able to see the exterior of the house where he lived with his young bride starting in 1847 and the wheelwright shop next to it. The boards of the wheelwright shop looked like the original boards with the old nails. Not only did I not know whether the chapel was still in existence, but I had no idea that his house and workshop were still standing. William by trade built wagons during the week, and preached on the Lord’s Day. He would regularly walk 10-20 miles and even further every Lord’s Day to preach in one of the chapels throughout the county. William Audiss would write, “I am now 21 years of age and now free from the bond with an ungodly master. That yoke is now gone. The past three years have been a time of persecution, temptation, sorrow and trial, and very laborious. I was working hard all the week at my business, and then traveling on Sunday to preach the gospel, many journeys from 10 to 20 miles on foot, and preaching twice, and sometimes three times, and many of the appointments at this time were in the open air, and I had very little help. The preacher had the singing, praying, and preaching to do and sometimes lost a meal time at that. Coming home at midnight, faint and weary, but had to be at work at six o’clock the next morning. Many times I felt more fit for medical aid and rest than work. But God was my great help – physically and mentally. I never lost an hour’s work by my hard labours on the Sabbath day. But I got a great many wonderful blessings, and saw many souls converted to God. Hallelujah” (December 2, 1842).

I had brought with me a digital camcorder to document all my journeys, and I was filming all of this unfolding of history. Mabel had given me a key to the chapel earlier, so I re-enacted what it would have been like for William Audiss with his family to walk out of his rented house, check out the wagon shop, and walk down the same road on Chapel Lane to the chapel and preach.

Concerning his preaching circuit, his modus operandi was to go to a town sometimes with a fellow brother Primitive Methodist and simply start singing hymns and then preaching in the open fields. Crowds would gather, and interested persons would be encouraged to go to a local house for a prayer meeting and love feast where personal evangelism would continue. It was in this context that William Audiss said many souls would be converted.

From his diary, William Audiss recorded just prior to his immigration to America that within the thirty-one years of ministry in Lincolnshire County, he had visited 43 towns, and preached 1708 sermons. Concerning the miles traveled, he states, “The miles I traveled to and from these places was 10,504 miles and the most part on foot, but I have never regretted. I shall never repay the good Lord for what He has done; for if I had my life to do over again, I would do more if I could” (1871).

The story of William Audiss’ life and the impact upon future generations is surely a tale of God’s faithfulness that spans the ages. He would passionately describe his first conviction of sin as a nine year old boy, where at a Primitive Methodist prayer meeting he remembered them praying for him, “God bless this little boy.” Though William’s parents were not Christians, he recalled visiting his godly grandparents as a child. William would write, “They, being good old Christian people, and as all good old Christian people do, before they retired at night had family worship. The old gentleman read the scriptures and then they both prayed and very earnestly prayed for their children, and particularly did they pray that God would bless this little boy and make him good and make him a blessing in the world. This made me feel as before and to wish I was a Christian. I was now about ten years of age “ (1840).

William would describe how he fell into the ways of the world until he was 18 years old. He mentioned that on a Sabbath Day in 1839 that he and others bent on religious persecution would attend a little cottage in Helpringham (only a mile from Little Hale) were an old Primitive Methodist preacher would preach in a most earnest and faithful manner, warning sinners to flee from the wrath to come and pointing them to the Savior of sinners. During my visit, I found the little chapel in Helpringham where William Audiss felt the conviction of sin. As I was filming the place of this little chapel, I could not help but see the contrast between it and the massive 14th Century edifice only a hundred yards away of a now Church of England building. In a town of less than a thousand people stood this incredible ancient church building. A stranger in Helpringham earlier in the day told me, “Yes, that is a beautiful piece of architecture, but nothing much is happening inside.” Within a radius of 10 miles and in small towns were no less than about ten of these massive 14th Century church buildings. Apparently, the Lord of the manor during the Middle Ages had these churches built for his manor’s inhabitants.

William Audiss would describe how God would direct a good Christian man to speak to him about his soul. The man would invite him to a revival meeting at Little Hale Chapel. It would be in the Little Hale Chapel where on a Sunday night that God would burden his heart to repent of his sins and give his life to Christ. William writes about that evening “O, give me the blessing of pardon – the evidence of my acceptance and I will give my soul, body, and all that I have and are to Thee, and I will serve Thee the best I can all the days of my life. And while thus wrestling with God, and consecrating my all to Him the burden of my heart rolled away. And such a flood of joy sprung up in my heart I have never been able to describe. This I believe was the new birth the Savior taught Nicodemus, when He said, ‘the wind bloweth where it listeth and Thou hearest the sound thereof , but canst not tell whence it cometh, and wither it goeth so is everyone that is born of the Spirit.’ (John 3:8). Old things were cast away and all things became new. I then could sing with others. My soul is now united to Christ, the living vine. His grace I long have slated but now I feel Him mine. I was to God a stranger until Jesus took me in, and freed my soul from danger and pardoned my sins” (1839).

While his theological education obviously could have been much expanded and improved, for he was without any formal training, William Audiss made the most of the light that was entrusted unto him. His preaching and others like him of the Primitive Methodists focused upon exposing their listeners to the reality of their sins and calling them to repentance and faith in Christ. Essentially, he would be viewed today as fundamentally an evangelist. In his own words, he said, “A great deal of our work was missioning new places, holding our services in the open air until we could do better” (September 3, 1854).

One of the most powerful entries in his diary was when he was engaged in open air preaching in the town of Orbling, which was about five miles from Little Hale. As I visited that town, I went to an open field nearby to get a sense of what it must have been like for William Audiss to arrive in a town and start preaching in the open field. The following is one of the more powerful stories of his preaching. William Audiss writes, “Billingboro and Orbling, 10 mile walk, spoke twice. These were Mission places. Preached in the open air, two large congregations; powerful time. Whilst I was singing down the street of the latter place an old magistrate offered an ungodly man a sum of money to go and drive me out of the town. He accepted the offer and started to do his work. But when he arrived I was preaching and God was wonderfully blessing the Word. The Word went with power to his heart. He was thoroughly awakened to a sense of his danger and returned home with a determination to lead a new life. A short time later, he got converted and afterwards became a local preacher. Glory to God, one more soul for Christ. Hallelujah” (December 26, 1841).

William Audiss would make the decision to leave England after much prayer and God’s providential provision in the sale of his business when very difficult economic times swept England, affecting his wheelwright business. Apparently, many had immigrated to America, and some of his relatives had immigrated to Wisconsin.

A very touching entry in the diary are comments about his last two sermons in Little Hale Chapel. He preached on Ezekiel 33:7-11 and Hebrews 13:14. William writes, “Here I tried to remind my dear friends for the last time that I had acted as a watchman over them for 24 years. I had tried to live before them as a Christian man. I had faithfully warned them of the consequences of sin, even eternal damnation. I had showed them again and again that God had no pleasure in the death of a sinner, but would rather they would all return, repent, and live. I told them that they knew I had pointed them again and again to the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world. And now for the last time in this world, I exhort you one and all to that Saviour who will save to the uttermost all who will come unto Him. My dear friends, I beg of you to meet me in Heaven. This was an impressive time, many wept and many promised they would meet me in Heaven” (April 16, 1871).

In 1871 William Audiss with his wife and ten children would get on a train at Heckington Station, only about three miles away, and go to Liverpool to set sail for New York and then eventually to Wisconsin. I saw the train station, and it probably has not changed much in 150 years. I videoed the area like all the others, taking footage of the railroad tracks that would take him to the New World, where a new legacy would begin for another 31 years before his death in 1902. He would never return to England, but his legacy had been left. The Sleaford Gazette, a local newspaper, would carry his departure, mentioning that there were many who bid his family farewell with many tears, that they would be sadly missed, as indeed they were (Sleaford Gazette, May 6, 1871).

So, what would I preach on as the great, great grandson on the 167th anniversary of some sermons he preached in Little Hale Chapel? I must preach on God’s faithfulness that spans the ages, for His covenantal faithfulness to one of His servants. In my sermon, I had to refer to Psalm 127:3-5 – “Behold, children are a gift of the Lord; the fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, so are the children of one’s youth. How blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They shall not be ashamed, when they speak with their enemies in the gates. I said, “If I could speak to my great, great grandfather, what would I say to him? I would say - Great, great granddaddy, one of the arrows that you shot into the future so many years ago has traversed the great ocean and found its mark in the land of your origin. Your great, great grandson has brought back to this place the Gospel you loved so much. The circle has been completed.”

I had brought to England forty copies of literature that I had written on knowing the Gospel, a Gospel tract, and a booklet on being prayer warriors for God. I said that I was not taking them back to America, but would you see that they are distributed throughout the county. I was told sometime later by Alf Wilkinson that they were all distributed per my request. I would leave a copy of the bookDelivered By Angels: God’s Providence For An American Soldier In Iraq that I co-authored with my son Brian Otis about God’s faithfulness to spare my son in the war in Iraq. I left it for Alf Wilkinson as the secretary of the historical society to put it in their historical archives with these words in the front cover of the book – “"This book was written by Brian Otis, the great, great, great grandson of the Rev. William Audiss and presented to Little Hale Methodist Chapel on September 26, 2008 by the great, great grandson - Rev. John M. Otis."

We have lost the importance in our culture of diaries. Maybe its due to the onset of modern technology. However, we each should leave some kind of written legacy for our posterity, particularly those of us who are preachers. Generations yet to come need to know the past that has played such a vital role in creating present realities. It is one of the reasons why I have for years emphasized a writing ministry. Not only can I minister to more people, but I can leave a legacy for my own posterity long after I have gone the way of all men. Future generations need to know the battles that I fought for His sake. Faithful stories need to be remembered so that our glorious God receives all the praise.

A reporter for the Sleaford Standard, the new name for the same newspaper that carried the story of William Audiss’ departure from England, would take a picture of me in front of Little Hale chapel and write a very nice article in the October 8, 2008 edition with the title – “Preaching Runs In the Family: American minister follows in relative’s footsteps.”

Several Scripture passages are noteworthy regarding my trip to England. Psalm 45:17 says, “I will cause Thy name to be remembered in all generations; therefore the peoples will give Thee thanks forever and ever.” The diary of Rev. William Audiss was more than a documentation for himself of his ministry. I don’t know if he fully realized the magnitude of his diary when he decided to keep it for fifty-eight years. I have an inkling that he did it also for future generations to know of God’s faithfulness to him. He knew as he wrote that the children are the future. God would preserve that diary for over a century and a half so that grandchildren and great, great, great grandchildren would know of the power of God that saves souls. His posterity has come to understand and relish his memory. How true are the words of Psalm 102:18 – “This will be written for the generation to come; that a people yet to be created may praise the Lord. My aunt Lola would shed tears as she would discover for the first time about her great grandfather. I would shed my own tears as the great, great grandson would read and marvel of his dedication, zeal, and faithfulness to preach the Gospel. God would raise up through his bloodline another preacher in myself, who would cross the vast waters to the Old World, proclaiming the faithfulness of God to the place of origin. In my presence, God would confirm to the world that His faithfulness to William Audiss indeed spans the centuries.

Romans 10: 14-15 states, “How then shall they call upon Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they are sent? Just as it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who bring glad tidings of good things.” For three days, I traveled 327 miles following the beautiful steps of my great, great grandfather. I beheld with my own eyes the legacy that he left. I would remember what Psalm 44:1 says, “O God, we have heard with our ears, our fathers have told us, the work that Thou didst in their days, in the days of old. I have remembered; I have marveled; and I have indeed given thanks to our great God. May I be found faithful to the end as was my great, great grandfather. May others yet created remember all our days of old and the battles we fought in our time for His glory.

*** For those interested in seeing the sermon Rev. John M. Otis preached in the pulpit of his great, great grandfather in Little Hale, Lincolnshire, England, it can be viewed on pastor Otis’ church website at www.westminsterrpcus.org.

God’s Faithfulness Spans The AgesSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Monday, January 18, 2010

Oliver Cromwell-Death Mask

Since we are listening to the series on Oliver Cromwell, I thought it was interesting that Doug Philips had this post up on his blog. Pastor Morecraft has personally shown us this death mask before, he comment? "Ugly Cus' wasn't he?" All in all it is pretty neat. And, Morecraft has this death mask housed on a book shelf in his library at Chalcedon.

Holding Cromwell's Head

It was my distinct pleasure to spend an hour in the pastor’s study of Dr. Joe Morecraft, host of the 40th Anniversary Chalcedon Conference, who handed me a copy of the death mask of hero Oliver Cromwell.

The death mask was taken at the moment of death and has been preserved over the years. Upon the return of Charles II to England and his assumption of the throne, Cromwell and his daughter were disinterred, their corpses decapitated, and their heads placed on the gates of London where they remained for some time. Notwithstanding their posthumous desecration by King and Anglican elite, Cromwell remains one of the great figures in the history of Christendom.

-Doug Phillips of Vision Forum

Oliver Cromwell-Death MaskSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector, Part I

Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector, Part ISocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Charles I and Oliver Cromwell ~ By Joe Morecraft


Oliver Cromwell
Lord Protector of England, Scotland, and Ireland.


King Charles, I of England


This, and the following messages are taken from the 'History of the Reformation' by Dr. Joe C. Morecraft, III. They are a great resource for any Christian or student of history.

You can find the whole series on Sermon Audio. There is the brief introduction to this amazing series posted on Sermon Audio:

The Reformation comes alive in this fascinating study of its history.

In 49 messages, Joe Morecraft covers the most important people and events of the Reformation. Beginning with the Westminster Confession and ending with the lives of many of the Westminster Divines, he covers the Scottish Covenanters, John Calvin, John Knox, Oliver Cromwell as well as some of the Reformation's darkest villains like Bloody Mary and King James I.

This series is a must listen for any serious student of church history as well as those who just love the stories of the faithful men and women who worked, many of them suffering great persecution, to return the Church to faithfulness.

Charles I and Oliver Cromwell ~ By Joe MorecraftSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Monday, October 5, 2009

In Honor of the Reformation, II -10/5/09

The Assembly of Participants

A new emperor, Charles V, had ascended the throne of Germany, and the emissaries of Rome hastened to present their congratulations and induce the monarch to employ his power against the Reformation. On the other hand, the elector of Saxony, to whom Charles was in great degree indebted for his crown, entreated him to take no step against Luther until he should have granted him a hearing. The emperor was thus placed in a position of great perplexity and embarrassment. The papists would be satisfied with nothing short of an imperial edict sentencing Luther to death.Dr. Martin Luther The elector had declared firmly that "neither his imperial majesty nor any other person had shown that Luther's writings had been refuted;" therefore he requested "that Dr. Luther should be furnished with a safe-conduct, so that he might appear before a tribunal of learned, pious, and impartial judges." [D'Aubigne, J.H. Merle (1794-1872), b. 6, ch. 11].

The attention of all parties was now directed to the assembly of the German states which convened at Worms soon after the accession of Charles to the empire. There were important political questions and interests to be considered by this national council; for the first time the Emperor Chrales V in later yearsprinces of Germany were to meet their youthful monarch in deliberative assembly. From all parts of the fatherland had come the dignitaries of church and state. Secular lords, highborn, powerful, and jealous of their hereditary rights; princely ecclesiastics, flushed with their conscious superiority in rank and power; courtly knights and their armed retainers; and ambassadors from foreign and distant lands,--all gathered at Worms. Yet in that vast assembly the subject that excited the deepest interest was the cause of the Saxon Reformer.

Charles had previously directed the elector to bring Luther with him to the Diet, assuring him of protection, and promising a free discussion, with competent persons, of the questions in dispute. Luther was anxious to appear before the emperor. His health was at this time much impaired; yet he wrote to the elector: "If I cannot go to Worms in good health, I will be carried there, sick as I am. For if the emperor calls me, I cannot doubt that it is the call of God Himself. If they desire to use violence against me, and that is very probable (for it is not for their instruction that they order me to appear), I place the matter in the Lord's hands.City of Worms He still lives and reigns who preserved the three young men in the burning fiery furnace. If He will not save me, my life is of little consequence. Let us only prevent the gospel from being exposed to the scorn of the wicked, and let us shed our blood for it, for fear they should triumph. It is not for me to decide whether my life or my death will contribute most to the salvation of all. . . . You may expect everything from me. . . except flight and recantation. Fly I cannot, and still less retract."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 1.

As the news was circulated at Worms that Luther was to appear before the Diet, a general excitement was created. Aleander,Artist's impression of Papal Legate Aleander the papal legate to whom the case had been specially entrusted, was alarmed and enraged. He saw that the result would be disastrous to the papal cause. To institute inquiry into a case in which the pope had already pronounced sentence of condemnation would be to cast contempt upon the authority of the sovereign pontiff. Furthermore, he was apprehensive that the eloquent and powerful arguments of this man might turn away many of the princes from the cause of the pope. He therefore, in the most urgent manner, remonstrated with Charles against Luther's appearance at Worms. About this time the bull declaring Luther's excommunication was published; and this, coupled with the representations of the legate, induced the emperor to yield. He wrote to the elector that if Luther would not retract, he must remain at Wittenberg.

Not content with this victory, Aleander labored with all the power and cunning at his command to secure Luther's condemnation. With a persistence worthy of a better cause, he urged the matter upon the attention of princes, prelates, and other members of the assembly, accusing the Reformer of "sedition, rebellion, impiety, and blasphemy."[60] But the vehemence and passion manifested by the legate revealed too plainly the spirit by which he was actuated. "He is moved by hatred and vengeance," was the general remark, "much more than by zeal and piety."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 1. The majority of the Diet were more than ever inclined to regard Luther's cause with favor.

With redoubled zeal Aleander urged upon the emperor the duty of executing the papal edicts. But under the laws of Germany this could not be done without the concurrence of the princes; and, overcome at last by the legate's importunity, Charles bade him present his case to the Diet. "It was a proud day for the nuncio. The assembly was a great one: the cause was even greater. Aleander was to plead for Rome, . . . the mother and mistress of all churches." He was to vindicate the princedom of Peter before the assembled principalities of Christendom. "He had the gift of eloquence, and he rose to the greatness of the occasion. Providence ordered it that Rome should appear and plead by the ablest of her orators in the presence of the most august of tribunals, before she was condemned." [Wylie, b. 6, ch. 4]. Duke Frederick of SaxonyWith some misgivings those who favored the Reformer looked forward to the effect of Aleander's speech. The elector of Saxony was not present, but by his direction some of his councilors attended to take notes of the nuncio's address.

With all the power of learning and eloquence, Aleander set himself to overthrow the truth. Charge after charge he hurled against Luther as an enemy of the church and the state, the living and the dead, clergy and laity, councils and private Christians. "In Luther's errors there is enough," he declared, to warrant the burning of "a hundred thousand heretics."

As Positions Solidify

In conclusion he endeavored to cast contempt upon the adherents of the reformed faith: "What are all these Lutherans? A crew of insolent pedagogues, corrupt priests, dissolute monks, ignorant lawyers, and degraded nobles, with the common people whom they have misled and perverted. How far superior to them is the Catholic party in number, ability, and power! A unanimous decree from this illustrious assembly will enlighten the simple, warn the imprudent, decide the waverers, and give strength to the weak." --D'Aubigne, b. 7, ch. 3.

With such weapons the advocates of truth in every age have been attacked. The same arguments are still urged against all who dare to present, in opposition to established errors, the plain and direct teachings of God's word. "Who are these preachers of new doctrines?" exclaim those who desire a popular religion. "They are unlearned, few in numbers, and of the poorer class. Yet they claim to have the truth, and to be the chosen people of God. They are ignorant and deceived. How greatly superior in numbers and influence is our church! How many great and learned men are among us! How much more power is on our side!" These are the arguments that have a telling influence upon the world; but they are no more conclusive now than in the days of the Reformer.

The Reformation did not, as many suppose, end with Luther.[68] It is to be continued to the close of this world's history. Luther had a great work to do in reflecting to others the light which God had permitted to shine upon him; yet he did not receive all the light which was to be given to the world. From that time to this, new light has been continually shining upon the Scriptures, and new truths have been constantly unfolding.

The legate's address made a deep impression upon the Diet. There was no Luther present, with the clear and convincing truths of God's word, to vanquish the papal champion. No attempt was made to defend the Reformer. There was manifest a general disposition not only to condemn him and the doctrines which he taught, but if possible to uproot the heresy. Rome had enjoyed the most favorable opportunity to defend her cause. All that she could say in her own vindication had been said. But the apparent victory was the signal of defeat. Henceforth the contrast between truth and error would be more clearly seen, as they should take the field in open warfare. Never from that day would Rome stand as secure as she had stood.

While most of the members of the Diet would not have hesitated to yield up Luther to the vengeance of Rome, many of them saw and deplored the existing depravity in the church, and desired a suppression of the abuses suffered by the German people in consequence of the corruption and greed of the hierarchy. The legate had presented the papal rule in the most favorable light. Now the Lord moved upon a member of the Diet to give a true delineation of the effects of papal tyranny. With noble firmness, Duke George of Saxony stood up in that princely assembly and specified with terrible exactness the deceptions and abominations of popery, and their dire results. In closing he said:

"These are some of the abuses that cry out against Rome. All shame has been put aside, and their only object is . . . money, money, money, . . . so that the preachers who should teach the truth, utter nothing but falsehoods, and are not only tolerated, but rewarded, because the greater their lies, the greater their gain. It is from this foul spring that such tainted waters flow. Debauchery stretches out the hand to avarice. . . . Alas, it is the scandal caused by the clergy that hurls so many poor souls into eternal condemnation. A general reform must be effected."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 4.

A more able and forcible denunciation of the papal abuses could not have been presented by Luther himself; and the fact that the speaker was a determined enemy of the Reformer's gave greater influence to his words.

Had Eyes been Open

Had the eyes of the assembly been opened, they would have beheld angels of God in the midst of them, shedding beams of light athwart the darkness of error and opening minds and hearts to the reception of truth. It was the power of the God of truth and wisdom that controlled even the adversaries of the reformation, and thus prepared the way for the great work about to be accomplished. Martin Luther was not present; but the voice of One greater than Luther had been heard in that assembly.

A committee was at once appointed by the Diet to prepare an enumeration of the papal oppressions that weighed so heavily on the German people. This list, containing a hundred and one specifications, was presented to the emperor, with a request that he would take immediate measures for the correction of these abuses. "What a loss of Christian souls," said the petitioners, "what depredations, what extortions, on account of the scandals by which the spiritual head of Christendom is surrounded! It is our duty to prevent the ruin and dishonor of our people. For this reason we most humbly but most urgently entreat you to order a general reformation, and to undertake its accomplishment."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 4.

The council now demanded the Reformer's appearance before them. Notwithstanding the entreaties, protests, and threats of Aleander, the emperor at last consented, and Luther was summoned to appear before the Diet. With the summons was issued a safe-conduct, ensuring his return to a place of security. These were borne to Wittenberg by a herald, who was commissioned to conduct him to Worms.

The friends of Luther were terrified and distressed. Knowing the prejudice and enmity against him, they feared that even his safe-conduct would not be respected, and they entreated him not to imperil his life. He replied: "The papists do not desire my coming to Worms, but my condemnation and my death. It matters not. Pray not for me, but for the word of God. . . . Christ will give me His Spirit to overcome these ministers of error. I despise them during my life; I shall triumph over them by my death. They are busy at Worms about compelling me to retract; and this shall be my retraction: I said formerly that the pope was Christ's vicar; now I assert that he is our Lord's adversary, and the devil's apostle."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 6.

Luther was not to make his perilous journey alone. Besides the imperial messenger, three of his firmest friends determined to accompany him. Melanchthon earnestly desired to join them. Philip MelanchthonHis heart was knit to Luther's, and he yearned to follow him, if need be, to prison or to death. But his entreaties were denied. Should Luther perish, the hopes of the Reformation must center upon his youthful colaborer. Said the Reformer as he parted from Melanchthon: "If I do not return, and my enemies put me to death, continue to teach, and stand fast in the truth. Labor in my stead. . . . If you survive, my death will be of little consequence."-- Ibid., b. 7, ch. 7. Students and citizens who had gathered to witness Luther's departure were deeply moved. A multitude whose hearts had been touched by the gospel, bade him farewell with weeping. Thus the Reformer and his companions set out from Wittenberg.

On the journey they saw that the minds of the people were oppressed by gloomy forebodings. At some towns no honors were proffered them. As they stopped for the night, a friendly priest expressed his fears by holding up before Luther the portrait of an Italian reformer who had suffered martyrdom. The next day they learned that Luther's writings had been condemned at Worms. Imperial messengers were proclaiming the emperor's decree and calling upon the people to bring the proscribed works to the magistrates. The herald, fearing for Luther's safety at the council, and thinking that already his resolution might be shaken, asked if he still wished to go forward. He answered: "Although interdicted in every city, I shall go on."--Ibid., b. 7, ch. 7.

At Erfurt, Luther was received with honor. Surrounded by admiring crowds, he passed through the streets that he had often traversed with his beggar's wallet. He visited his convent cell, and thought upon the struggles through which the light now flooding Germany had been shed upon his soul. He was urged to preach. This he had been forbidden to do, but the herald granted him permission, and the friar who had once been made the drudge of the convent, now entered the pulpit.

To a crowded assembly he spoke from the words of Christ, "Peace be unto you." "Philosophers, doctors, and writers," he said, "have endeavored to teach men the way to obtain everlasting life, and they have not succeeded. I will now tell it to you: . . . God has raised one Man from the dead, the Lord Jesus Christ, that He might destroy death, extirpate sin, and shut the gates of hell. This is the work of salvation. . . . Christ has vanquished! this is the joyful news; and we are saved by His work, and not by our own. . . . Our Lord Jesus Christ said, 'Peace be unto you; behold My hands;' that is to say, Behold, O man! it is I, I alone, who have taken away thy sin, and ransomed thee; and now thou hast peace, saith the Lord."

In Honor of the Reformation, II -10/5/09SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Sunday, October 4, 2009

In Honor of the Reformation... -10/4/09


Kings Hapsburg dynasty
Left rear:
(1) Maximillian I. (1493-1519), he wears the same royal headress which can also be seen over the entrance of the Universidad of Salamanca, Spain, but stems from the early 16th century.; Wife of Maximillian I., (2) Mary of Burgundy (Fr. Comte); Their son, (3) Philip the Handsome (died 1506); Philip's marriage to (4) Joanna of Spain (3rd child of Ferdinand & Isabella of Spain) brought a son (front center) who became the Emperor (5) Emperor Charles V. of Spain (born 2/24/1500 - (reigned 1519-1556) - crowned king Tuesday, 10/23/1520 at Aix (southern France at ca. E5.4° & N43.5°))- died of gout by 1558 - He was never legally married, had 1 girl (Margaret) and 1 son (John Don)), of the so-called `Holy Roman Empire'.[Charles main palace was the Alhambra in Granada, Spain, his capital was in Toledo. His actual whereabouts at any given time are not easy to trace. At the end of his life, Charles lived in Yuste (Spain) a cloister town (W5.8°& N40.005°)
Front row right: (6) Mistress of Charles V.(??)
Charles V. became especially famous because of his connection with the Protestant Reformation in Central Europe, however, it is important to remember that it was not one person which caused the reformation but how God's guidance in the whole religious, political, and social situation ripened the world and Luther to contribute in rediscovering a divine truth.
For the Biography of Charles V. see: http://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/charles5.htm

Luther's Appearance at the Diet of Worms

Born at Eisleben, Saxony, in 1483, Martin Luther was educated first at the University of Magdeburg, then at Erfurt.[10] When Staupitius opened the University at Wittenberg, Luther was hired to teach and preach there by the Elector Frederic, Duke of Saxony. Having set out to study the gospels and Psalms, Luther showed the difference between the Law and the Gospel confounding the teaching that men could earnsalvation by his own works with mere outward discipline. In 1516, Pope Leo X. succeeded Julius II and under pretense of war against the Turks began to sell indulgences. Archbishop Albert of Mainz then made a deal with Pope Leo that would divide the proceeds of the sale of these indulgences in German provinces, half for the pope and half for Albert. Indulgences could offer forgiveness for sins, changing of vows, and less time in purgatory.[15] Luther was horrified at this misuse of blessings and resolved to publicize these issues. He wanted to defend the position that the pope had no power to forgive sins and remarked that the logical conclusion of the doctrine of papal control over purgatory was that the pope would do for money what he refused to do for Christian love. The Dominican Friar Tetzel (1469-1519) made the sale of these indulgences into a public nuisancy and blasphemy causing even the poor to give their last quarters for worthless pieces of paper.

In January 1519 the Emperor Maximilian died. With the vote of the Duke of Saxony Charles, King of Spain rather then Francis I. (1515-1547), the French King, was elected Emperor.[20]

After the week long disputation with Eck at Augsburg, the cardinals burned the books of Luther, which caused the monk to do the same to the decrees of the pope on December 10, 1520. But the Emperor Charles had set a Diet for January 6th, 1521 at Worms. By March 6th the emperor sent letters to Luther to appear at Worms twenty one days after receiving them accompanied by Casper Sturm, the emperor's herald. Luther, accompanied by few friends, arrived in Worms Tuesday, April 16, 1521 after two weeks of traveling.

To Be Continued...Click Here for Full Article

In Honor of the Reformation... -10/4/09SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend